Comparison between Shunt compensation and Synchronous phase modifier
⚡ Shunt Compensation
Shunt compensation is a method of controlling system voltage by connecting shunt capacitors or shunt reactors directly to the transmission network.
-
Shunt Capacitors → supply reactive power (kVAR) to the system, thereby raising voltage during light load or under-voltage conditions.
-
Shunt Reactors → absorb reactive power, thereby reducing voltage during no-load or light-load conditions when the voltage tends to rise.
🔑 Engineering perspective:
-
Simple, static, and reliable solution.
-
Provides step-by-step voltage regulation since capacitor banks can be switched in or out.
-
Widely used in transmission and distribution systems due to low cost and negligible maintenance.
⚡ Synchronous Phase Modifier (Synchronous Condenser)
A synchronous phase modifier (also known as a synchronous condenser) is essentially a synchronous motor running without mechanical load.
-
When under-excited, it draws reactive power → acts like an inductor.
-
When over-excited, it supplies reactive power → acts like a capacitor.
🔑 Engineering perspective:
-
Provides smooth and continuous voltage control, unlike stepwise switching.
-
Can improve short-circuit power and system inertia, but consumes active power for operation.
-
Requires a proper starting method (pony motor, damper winding, or static frequency converter) to reach synchronous speed.
-
Being a rotating machine, it demands higher maintenance and has a much higher capital and operating cost compared to shunt devices.
👉 In practice:
-
Shunt compensation is the most common choice in modern grids.
-
Synchronous phase modifiers were historically used in large transmission networks before the development of Static VAR Compensators (SVCs) and STATCOMs, which are now preferred for dynamic voltage control.
Shunt Compensation vs. Synchronous Phase Modifier
Sr. No. |
Shunt Compensation |
Synchronous Phase Modifier |
1 |
Separate
shunt capacitor and reactor are required for voltage control |
A
single synchronous motor works as an inductor (under-excited) or capacitor
(over-excited) for voltage control |
2 |
Step-by-step
voltage regulation is possible |
Smooth
continuous voltage regulation is possible |
3 |
No
starting methods required |
Requires
starting methods to achieve synchronism |
4 |
Consumes
reactive power only |
Consumes
active power in addition to reactive adjustment |
5 |
Improves
transient stability |
Reduces
transient stability |
6 |
Requires
very little maintenance |
Requires
more maintenance due to rotating machinery |
7 |
Very
low cost |
Much
higher cost |
8 |
Most
practical solution for voltage control |
Rarely
used in practice due to disadvantages |
Comments
Post a Comment