Transmission conductors are Aluminum instead of copper

Why Aluminum Conductors Are Used in Transmission Instead of Copper Conductors

Key Requirements for Transmission Line Conductors

The materials selected for overhead transmission lines must satisfy the following essential properties:

1. Low cost of construction

2. Low electrical resistivity

3. High electrical conductivity

4. Low temperature coefficient of resistance

5. High current-carrying capacity

6. Adequate mechanical strength

7. Good weather resistance and corrosion resistance

8. Sufficient elasticity for mechanical stability

Among available metals, copper, aluminum, and steel are widely considered. In practice, these are often used individually or in composite forms (e.g., ACSR – Aluminum Conductor Steel Reinforced).

---

Copper vs. Aluminum – A Technical Comparison

• Conductivity:
  Copper has the highest conductivity among common conductor materials. Aluminum offers about 61% of copper’s conductivity.

• Weight:
  For the same resistance, aluminum weighs nearly half that of copper. This reduced weight significantly impacts tower design and overall infrastructure cost.

• Resistance:
  On a per-length basis, aluminum has about 1.6 times the resistance of copper of the same gauge. This implies 60% higher I²R losses for the same conductor cross-section. However, this disadvantage can be mitigated by increasing the cross-sectional area of aluminum conductors.

---

Why Aluminum is Preferred Over Copper

(i) Lower Cost

• Aluminum is 5–6 times cheaper than copper on a per-kilogram basis.

• For long-distance transmission (hundreds of kilometers), the raw material cost savings are enormous.

• Copper’s higher weight demands stronger and costlier transmission towers, whereas aluminum’s lightweight nature reduces tower design and foundation costs.

(ii) Lower Density & Better Cross-Sectional Design

• Aluminum’s density is about one-third that of copper.

• By increasing the aluminum conductor’s cross-sectional area, resistance decreases, and I²R losses reduce significantly.

• Example: Doubling the cross-sectional area of aluminum reduces I²R losses by about 20%. Even after increasing diameter, aluminum still weighs only about two-thirds of the equivalent copper conductor, keeping tower loads manageable.

• Net result: Up to 90% savings in conductor costs when considering both material and infrastructure.

---

Advantages of Aluminum Conductors

1. Reduced Power Losses: Increasing conductor size decreases resistance, reducing I²R losses (from ~6% to ~5% in practical cases).

2. Lower Construction Cost: Lightweight conductors reduce tower strength requirements, cutting infrastructure cost by up to 33%.

3. Material Cost Savings: With aluminum being much cheaper, the total wire cost is around 10% of copper conductors for equivalent transmission capacity.

4. Ease of Handling: Aluminum is more elastic and easier to string and bend compared to copper.

---

Why Not Steel Alone?

While steel is inexpensive and has very high tensile strength, it is unsuitable as the sole conductor due to:

• High magnetic permeability → reduces effective skin depth at 50/60 Hz.

• Higher AC resistance → leads to excessive energy losses.
  Thus, steel is mainly used as a reinforcement core (e.g., in ACSR conductors) rather than as the primary conducting medium.

---

Conclusion

Although copper offers superior conductivity and lower resistance, aluminum’s lightweight, lower cost, and adaptability in transmission design make it the preferred choice for long-distance power transmission. The trade-off of slightly higher losses is outweighed by the massive savings in material, construction, and maintenance costs.

---

Disclaimer

The above article is intended for educational and informational purposes only. While every effort has been made to ensure technical accuracy, actual conductor selection in transmission systems depends on multiple factors, including regional standards, cost variations, environmental conditions, and grid requirements. Engineers and project planners should always refer to national and international standards (such as IEC, IEEE, and IS codes) and perform detailed feasibility studies before finalizing material choices.

---