Buy Products here

Wednesday, April 23, 2014

Current Transformer Applications and their connections

Current transformers are used for measurement of current in any circuit. It has same working principle of that transformer but only used for step down of current. 

Current Transformer are used in measurement circuits , it is advisable to use CT instead of connection ammeter in the circuit as currents above 20A ammeter size becomes so large which is not feasible that is why current transformers are used. 

Current transformer primary has only one turn. Current transformer primary is not really a turn but just a conductor. The primary winding of Current Transformer has very few turns, while the secondary winding have a many turns depends upon how much the current must be stepped down.

There is extra precaution required during connections of CT are that secondary of CT should never be kept open which otherwise leads to very high secondary voltages which ultimately leads to burning of CT or even explosion of CT. So such conditions should be avoided.

Now let’s discuss about the same by considering a Transformer, Let’s take a Transformer with one primary turn and many secondary turns. Now when current flows through primary this will leads to very voltage induced in secondary of the order of Kilovolts. This is leads to breakdown of insulation of CT.

Usually Secondary current of CT are available with 5A rating and Input current may be of any ampere value.


CT Connection for Transformers:-
It has been found that usually in Star/ Delta connected transformer at Star side CT connections are in Delta and at Delta Side of Transformer CT connections are done in Star. 

This is usually done for the following reason:-

The delta CT connection circulates the zero-phase-sequence components of the currents inside the delta and thereby keeps them out of the external connections to the relay. This is necessary because there are no zero-phase-sequence components of current on the delta side of the power transformer for a ground fault on the wye side; therefore, there is no possibility of the zero-phase-sequence currents simply circulating between the sets of CTs and, if the CTs on the wye side were not delta connected, the zero-phase-sequence components would flow in the operating coils and cause the relay to operate undesirably for external ground faults.



3-Phase 4 Wire connections in Energy Meter
You will see the 3- Phase 4-wire connections on an Energy meter in which neutrals of every CT secondary are get grounded.

3-phase 4-wire connections

These connections are most popular in electrical system for connections of energy meters where there are three phase energy meters needed to be installed.



Sunday, April 20, 2014

Air conditioner Power Consumption

Whenever anyone going to Install an AC then first everyone planned power charges that they will have to pay after using AC.

Actually it is correct that one ton of air-conditioning is equal to 12,000 btu/hr. However the other question trying to convert a one ton A/C unit into kw/hr consumed is very dependant on the make and model of the air-conditioner, as well as its EER (energy Efficiency Rate). These range from 6-14 EER. Standard average one ton A/C unit consumes 1.335 KW/hr. 
#13650 btu= 4.0004205 kwh 
According to that for 1 Ton Ac 12000=3.51685 kwh 

And , for 2 Ton AC 24000 btu required , for 2 ton Ac , 
as per calculation 7.33706 kwh power required. 
But in practical is not there. 
As 2 Ton AC is taking max 14 to 15 Amp.Load. 
KW= VI 
= 15*220 
=3.3 kwh

So for 1 Ton AC Power Consumption stands at 1.7 KWH
For 1.5 Ton AC Power consumption stands at 2.5 KWH
Similarly for 2 Ton AC Power consumption will be 3.3 KWH.

Saturday, April 19, 2014

66KV to 132KV Cables Tests requirement

Here’s a detailed breakdown of the required tests for 66 kV and 132 kV XLPE cables per IS 7098 (Part 3) (covering 66 kV up to and including 220 kV), with reference to IS 60840 equivalents where applicable:


IS 7098 (Part 3): Tests for 66 kV & 132 kV XLPE Cables

Based on the BIS Product Manual for IS 7098 (Pt 3), the following tests are specified—applicable to each completed length of cable and per manufacturing batch/consignment (BIS):


📋 Test Checklist for 66 kV & 132 kV XLPE Power Cables

Standards Referenced: IS 7098 (Part 3), IS 60840 / IEC 60840


1. Routine Tests (Every Delivered Cable Length)

Test

Sequence

Acceptance Criteria

Conductor resistance

Pre-insulation

≤ values specified in IS 7098 (as per cross-section & temp. corrected to 20 °C)

Partial Discharge (PD) test

After manufacturing, before HV

PD ≤ 5 pC at 1.5 × U₀ (U₀ = phase-to-earth voltage)

High Voltage (HV) test, 1 min

After PD test

Withstand: 160 kV (66 kV class), 275 kV (132 kV class), no breakdown

Conductor & sheath inspection

Visual & dimensional

Within tolerance of IS 7098 Pt-3


2. Sample Tests (One Length per Batch / Consignment)

Test

Sequence

Acceptance Criteria

Check of cable dimensions

Pre-electrical

Within IS 7098 tolerances

Tensile strength & elongation (insulation/sheath)

Before ageing

≥ 12.5 N/mm² tensile; ≥ 200% elongation

Hot set test (XLPE insulation)

200 °C, 20 N/cm²

Elongation ≤ 175%, permanent set ≤ 15%

Shrinkage test (insulation)

Post heating

≤ 4%

Water penetration (if required)

Longitudinal / radial

No water ingress in defined period

Dielectric power factor & capacitance

Ambient & elevated temp.

Tan δ ≤ 0.001 at U₀, stable trend

Bending test + PD

Mechanical + electrical

No cracks; PD ≤ 5 pC

Flammability (PVC sheathed cables)

Vertical flame test

Self-extinguish within 60 s


3. Type Tests (Once per Design / Before Approval)

Test

Sequence

Acceptance Criteria

Lightning impulse withstand

After routine HV test

Withstand: 350–380 kV (66 kV); 650 kV (132 kV), no flashover/breakdown

Load cycle test (with PD monitoring)

Repeated heating/cooling cycles

PD ≤ 5 pC throughout; no failure

Long-term thermal ageing (insulation/sheath)

Accelerated ageing

Retention ≥ 80% tensile & elongation

Resistance of semi-conducting layers

As per IS 7098

≤ specified Ω·m resistivity

Short-circuit withstand test

Calculated or tested

Cable survives specified kA²s duty without damage

Impulse + Power frequency withstand of accessories (joints/terminations)

After installation simulation

No breakdown; PD ≤ 5 pC


Notes

·         Sequence: Mechanical/physical tests → PD → 1-min HV → Impulse withstand (for type) → Load cycle.

·         Acceptance: Any failure in routine test → reject length. Any failure in sample/type test → corrective action + retest.

·         Reference Um values:

o    66 kV cables → Um = 72.5 kV

o    132 kV cables → Um = 145 kV


✅ This checklist is structured for FAT / vendor QA:

·         Routine = each cable length

·         Sample = one per batch/consignment

·         Type = once per design


Do you want me to also format this into a professional table layout (Word/PDF-style) with company logo placeholders so you can use it directly in vendor FAT documentation?

 Summary Table: IS 7098 (Pt 3) Key Tests for 66 kV & 132 kV XLPE Cables

Test Category

IS 7098 Pt 3 Requirements (Frequency)

Conductor & Material Properties

Annealing, resistance, screening, insulation, armouring (each length or batch)

Sheath & Insulation Physical Tests

Thickness, tensile, hot set, shrinkage, aging (length-wise or batch-wise)

Semi-Conducting Layer Resistivity

Monthly sampling

Electrical & Dielectric Tests

Dielectric power factor, capacitance, load cycle, impulse, PD, HV withstand (daily to fortnightly)

Thermal & Environmental Durability

Thermal ageing, water tightness, bending + PD, flammability (monthly to quarterly)

Optional Tests

Cold impact, spark voltage on outer sheath (as agreed)


In Summary

·         66 kV and 132 kV XLPE cables under IS 7098 (Part 3) must undergo a comprehensive suite of type, routine, and acceptance tests, covering physical, mechanical, electrical, and environmental performance aspects.

·         Many of these parallel the IEC 60840 standard’s requirements for high-voltage extruded cable systems (30–150 kV), ensuring a globally aligned framework.

·         Frequency varies: some tests are mandatory per length, others per batch/consignment, and system-level electrical tests (e.g., impulse, load cycling, PD) follow a stricter routine (daily, fortnightly, monthly, or quarterly).

Nice — here are the standard numeric test voltages you asked for (power-frequency 1-minute and lightning-impulse) that are normally applied to 66 kV and 132 kV XLPE cable systems. I pulled these from IEC 60840 / allied technical specs and BIS product material so you can use them directly in test procedures or technical specifications.

Quick note: in standards/workspecs the cable rated/system voltages are often expressed as the highest system voltage (Um). In practice 66 kV class equipment is normally treated as Um = 72.5 kV and 132 kV as Um = 145 kV; test voltages in IEC/IS are defined against those class voltages. The tables below therefore use the commonly adopted Um equivalents.

Recommended test voltages (typical values used in IEC 60840 / practice)

Cable class (nominal)

Common Um used in standards

Power-frequency withstand (r.m.s.) — 1 min

Lightning impulse withstand (1.2/50 µs) — peak

66 kV

72.5 kV

~160 kV (rms) — 1 min. (Tianan Group)

~350 – 380 kV (peak) (commonly quoted 350–380 kV for 72.5 kV class). (Tianan Group, Hitachi Energy)

132 kV

145 kV

~275 kV (rms) — 1 min (often specified as 275 kV). (Hitachi Energy, Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited)

~650 kV (peak) (typical lightning impulse level for 145 kV class). (Hitachi Energy, Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited)

Additional clarifications & practical points

·         Duration & waveforms: the power-frequency test is normally applied for 1 minute (r.m.s. sinusoidal). The lightning test is standard 1.2/50 µs impulse (peak) as per IEC conventions.

·         Where these appear in standards: IEC-60840 contains the normative relationships/tables that give test voltages related to rated voltages (see clause on “relationship of test voltages to rated voltages” and Table(s) of test voltages). IS-7098 (Pt-3) follows the same framework for 66–220 kV XLPE cables (BIS Product Manual references). (BIS)

·         Range / rounding: some documents quote slightly different numbers depending on whether they use the nominal rated voltage (66/132 kV) or the standard Um value (72.5/145 kV) — and whether they round to manufacturer/utility practice. That’s why you see small spreads (e.g., 350 vs 380 kV). For procurement/test sheets use the exact numeric values called out by the purchaser/utility (or the specific clause/table in IEC 60840 / IS 7098 that applies). (BIS)

·         Accessories / joints / terminations: the impulse + power-frequency sequence and specific values for joints/terminations are covered in IEC-60840 Annexes/tables (H, G). Those accessory values can differ from cable-only values — check the relevant table when testing accessories.


 

Thursday, April 17, 2014

is Copper as earth pit is better then GI earth pit?


It has been often found that most of think that material used for earthing will reduce earthing resistance.
It has been often misconception that copper earthing plate or rod will have lower earth pit resistance then GI earthing plate or rod.

Lets clear this fundamental regarding as often falling in this trap will lead to higher investment on earthing by using copper as earthing material.


If one considers a plate electrode, the approximate resistance to earth is:

Resistance formula for Pipe earthing

(R) = (100r/2πL) X loge (4L/d)
·          L= Length of Pipe/Rod in cm
  • d=Diameter of Pipe/Rod in cm
  • r = Resistivity of Soil Ohm-meter.


Resistance formula for Plate earthing

(R) = (r/A) X under root(π/A).
·         r = Resistivity of Soil Ohm-meter.
·         A=Area of Earthing Plate m3.

As can be seen from the above formulas, only the resistivity of the soil and the physical dimensions of the electrode play a major role in determining the electrode resistance to earth.

The material resistivity is not considered anywhere in the above formulas.

Hence, irrespective of the material of construction of the earth electrode, any material of given dimensions would offer the same resistance to earth.


Material will help in the sizing and number of the earthing conductor or the protective conductor. Because, the short time withstand current ratings do vary according to the material of construction of the conductor.

So will never be losing end even when you are spending more money on Copper earthing instead of GI earthing.

Difference between grounding and earthing

Difference Between Grounding and Earthing: Myths vs Standards

Electrical safety often raises confusion between the terms grounding and earthing. Many people assume that grounding refers only to the connection of current-carrying conductors (like transformer or generator neutral) to earth, whereas earthing refers to the connection of non-current carrying metallic parts (like enclosures, motor frames, or panels).



👉 This distinction is actually a myth.

According to recognized standards, both grounding and earthing mean the same thing. The confusion mainly arises from differences in terminology across countries.


Grounding vs Earthing: Origin of the Terminology

  • British English (UK, IEC, IS): Uses the word Earthing.
  • American English (USA, IEEE, ANSI): Uses the word Grounding.

So, it’s more a matter of language preference than technical difference.


Standards and Definitions

IS 3043:1987 (Code of Practice for Earthing)

The terms “earthing” and “grounding” are synonymous.

IEC 60050 (International Electrotechnical Vocabulary)

“The terms earth and ground have both been generally used to explain the common electrical/signal reference interchangeably all over the world.”

  • USA & North America → Prefer Ground
  • UK & Europe, Asia → Prefer Earth

IEEE Definition of Grounding

Ground (Ground System): A conducting connection, whether intentional or accidental, through which an electrical circuit or equipment is connected to the earth or some conducting body of relatively large extent that serves instead of the earth.

Equivalent IEC/IS Definition of Earthing

Earth (Earth System): A conducting connection, whether intentional or accidental, through which an electrical circuit or equipment is connected to the mass of earth or some conducting body of relatively large extent that serves instead of the mass of earth.

👉 Notice how the definitions are identical — only the terminology differs.


Myth vs Reality

Myth

Reality

Grounding = current-carrying parts (neutral)

Grounding and Earthing are same concept, only different terminology

Earthing = non-current carrying metallic parts

Both terms mean connecting electrical parts to earth

They are two separate safety systems

They are synonymous in IEC, IS, IEEE & ANSI standards


Practical Takeaway

  • Whether you say “Earthing” or “Grounding”, the purpose is the same:
    ✅ To provide a safe path for fault currents
    ✅ To stabilize voltage during unbalanced conditions
    ✅ To protect human life and equipment from shock hazards
  • Use the terminology according to the standards you are following:
    • India / IEC → Earthing
    • USA / IEEE → Grounding

Conclusion

There is no technical difference between grounding and earthing. The confusion only exists because of British vs American English terminology. Engineers should focus on the function (safety and fault current dissipation) rather than the naming convention.


Wednesday, April 16, 2014

Fault current direction

Misconceptions About Fault Current Direction in Electrical Systems

In electrical engineering, there are widespread misconceptions regarding the direction of fault current. Many assume fault current simply flows from the source to the load, as in normal operation. However, this interpretation is misleading and can cause incorrect system protection design.




Fault Current Flow – The Correct Understanding

  • Under normal conditions, current flows from source → load.

  • During a fault at the load end, the effective resistance/impedance at the fault point reduces drastically (almost to zero).

  • As a result, the fault current appears to “flow backwards”: the load-end protection sees the fault first and should trip before the transformer or upstream breaker.

  • In reality, although current is still drawn from the source, the magnitude and point of detection of fault current is determined by the fault location.

👉 That is why modern electrical systems are designed to ensure protection coordination, so the load-end breaker trips first and prevents unnecessary tripping of upstream devices.


Protection System Design Principle

The guiding principle:

The protective device nearest to the fault must operate first.

This ensures selectivity and continuity of supply for the rest of the system.

Example rule:

  • If the load current = 300 A, the MCCB/SFU at load end should be rated slightly higher (e.g., 400 A frame size) but with protection settings at ≤300 A for overload and appropriately for short-circuit and earth fault.

  • This ensures the load trips before the transformer or feeder breaker.


Practical Example: 160 kW Motor

  • Motor rating: 160 kW

  • Rated current: ≈ 297 A

  • Load-end MCCB/SFU selection: 315 A

  • Overload relay setting: ≤ 297 A (rated motor current)

  • Earth fault relay setting: ~10% of full load current

  • Main upstream breaker (source side): 400 A MCCB/SFU for the entire motor system

This setup ensures that:

  1. The motor’s local protection clears any overload, short-circuit, or earth fault.

  2. The upstream breaker remains intact unless the local breaker fails or the fault propagates.

  3. Transformer protection remains the last line of defense, avoiding unnecessary trips.


Key Takeaways

  • Fault current is not simply “source to load”; it is governed by the fault location and system impedance.

  • Local protection must be set to isolate faults immediately.

  • Proper coordination between MCCBs, SFUs, and relays ensures system reliability and safety.


⚠️ Disclaimer: This article is intended for educational and engineering awareness purposes only. Actual protection coordination and fault current analysis must be carried out as per IEC/IS standards, manufacturer guidelines, and detailed short-circuit studies for each electrical installation. Always consult a qualified protection engineer before finalizing settings.



Star Delta Starter Changing Direction of motor

Star Delta Starter connected motor direction can be changed by changing either connections at main input line connections and O/P connections at Main and Delta contactors.

Star-Delta Starter Connection changing circuit is shown above.


Electrical Wiring Estimate for a 100 Gaj House

 For a 100 gaj house (approximately 900 sq. ft. or 83.6 m²),generally concealed copper wiring system using FRLS (Flame Retardant Low Smoke) ...