Buy Products here
Wednesday, April 23, 2014
Current Transformer Applications and their connections
Sunday, April 20, 2014
Air conditioner Power Consumption
Actually it is correct that one ton of air-conditioning is equal to 12,000 btu/hr. However the other question trying to convert a one ton A/C unit into kw/hr consumed is very dependant on the make and model of the air-conditioner, as well as its EER (energy Efficiency Rate). These range from 6-14 EER. Standard average one ton A/C unit consumes 1.335 KW/hr.
#13650 btu= 4.0004205 kwh
According to that for 1 Ton Ac 12000=3.51685 kwh
And , for 2 Ton AC 24000 btu required , for 2 ton Ac ,
as per calculation 7.33706 kwh power required.
But in practical is not there.
As 2 Ton AC is taking max 14 to 15 Amp.Load.
KW= VI
= 15*220
=3.3 kwh
So for 1 Ton AC Power Consumption stands at 1.7 KWH
For 1.5 Ton AC Power consumption stands at 2.5 KWH
Similarly for 2 Ton AC Power consumption will be 3.3 KWH.
Saturday, April 19, 2014
66KV to 132KV Cables Tests requirement
Here’s a detailed breakdown of the required tests for 66
kV and 132 kV XLPE cables per IS 7098 (Part 3)
(covering 66 kV up to and including 220 kV), with reference to IS
60840 equivalents where applicable:
IS 7098 (Part 3): Tests for 66 kV & 132 kV XLPE Cables
Based on the BIS Product Manual for IS 7098 (Pt 3),
the following tests are specified—applicable to each completed length of cable
and per manufacturing batch/consignment (BIS):
📋 Test Checklist for 66 kV & 132 kV XLPE
Power Cables
Standards Referenced: IS 7098 (Part 3), IS 60840 / IEC
60840
1. Routine Tests (Every Delivered Cable Length)
|
Test |
Sequence |
Acceptance
Criteria |
|
Conductor resistance |
Pre-insulation |
≤ values specified in IS 7098 (as per cross-section &
temp. corrected to 20 °C) |
|
Partial Discharge (PD) test |
After manufacturing, before HV |
PD ≤ 5 pC at 1.5 × U₀ (U₀ = phase-to-earth voltage) |
|
High Voltage (HV) test, 1
min |
After PD test |
Withstand: 160 kV (66 kV class), 275 kV (132 kV class), no
breakdown |
|
Conductor & sheath
inspection |
Visual & dimensional |
Within tolerance of IS 7098 Pt-3 |
2. Sample Tests (One Length per Batch / Consignment)
|
Test |
Sequence |
Acceptance
Criteria |
|
Check of cable dimensions |
Pre-electrical |
Within IS 7098 tolerances |
|
Tensile strength &
elongation (insulation/sheath) |
Before ageing |
≥ 12.5 N/mm² tensile; ≥ 200% elongation |
|
Hot set test (XLPE
insulation) |
200 °C, 20 N/cm² |
Elongation ≤ 175%, permanent set ≤ 15% |
|
Shrinkage test (insulation) |
Post heating |
≤ 4% |
|
Water penetration (if
required) |
Longitudinal / radial |
No water ingress in defined period |
|
Dielectric power factor
& capacitance |
Ambient & elevated temp. |
Tan δ ≤ 0.001 at U₀, stable trend |
|
Bending test + PD |
Mechanical + electrical |
No cracks; PD ≤ 5 pC |
|
Flammability (PVC sheathed
cables) |
Vertical flame test |
Self-extinguish within 60 s |
3. Type Tests (Once per Design / Before Approval)
|
Test |
Sequence |
Acceptance
Criteria |
|
Lightning impulse withstand |
After routine HV test |
Withstand: 350–380 kV (66 kV); 650 kV (132 kV), no
flashover/breakdown |
|
Load cycle test (with PD
monitoring) |
Repeated heating/cooling cycles |
PD ≤ 5 pC throughout; no failure |
|
Long-term thermal ageing
(insulation/sheath) |
Accelerated ageing |
Retention ≥ 80% tensile & elongation |
|
Resistance of
semi-conducting layers |
As per IS 7098 |
≤ specified Ω·m resistivity |
|
Short-circuit withstand
test |
Calculated or tested |
Cable survives specified kA²s duty without damage |
|
Impulse + Power frequency
withstand of accessories (joints/terminations) |
After installation simulation |
No breakdown; PD ≤ 5 pC |
Notes
·
Sequence: Mechanical/physical
tests → PD → 1-min HV → Impulse withstand (for type) → Load cycle.
·
Acceptance: Any failure in
routine test → reject length. Any failure in sample/type test → corrective
action + retest.
·
Reference Um values:
o
66 kV cables → Um = 72.5 kV
o
132 kV cables → Um = 145 kV
✅ This checklist is structured for FAT /
vendor QA:
·
Routine = each cable length
·
Sample = one per
batch/consignment
·
Type = once per design
Do you want me to also format this into a professional table layout
(Word/PDF-style) with company logo placeholders so you can use it
directly in vendor FAT documentation?
Summary Table: IS 7098 (Pt 3) Key Tests for 66 kV & 132 kV XLPE Cables
|
Test Category |
IS 7098 Pt 3 Requirements
(Frequency) |
|
Conductor & Material Properties |
Annealing, resistance, screening, insulation, armouring
(each length or batch) |
|
Sheath & Insulation Physical Tests |
Thickness, tensile, hot set, shrinkage, aging (length-wise
or batch-wise) |
|
Semi-Conducting Layer Resistivity |
Monthly sampling |
|
Electrical & Dielectric Tests |
Dielectric power factor, capacitance, load cycle, impulse,
PD, HV withstand (daily to fortnightly) |
|
Thermal & Environmental Durability |
Thermal ageing, water tightness, bending + PD,
flammability (monthly to quarterly) |
|
Optional Tests |
Cold impact, spark voltage on outer sheath (as agreed) |
In Summary
·
66 kV and 132 kV XLPE
cables under IS 7098 (Part 3) must
undergo a comprehensive suite of type, routine, and
acceptance tests, covering physical, mechanical, electrical,
and environmental performance aspects.
·
Many of these parallel the IEC
60840 standard’s requirements for high-voltage extruded cable
systems (30–150 kV), ensuring a globally aligned framework.
·
Frequency
varies: some tests are mandatory per length, others per batch/consignment,
and system-level electrical tests (e.g., impulse, load cycling, PD) follow a
stricter routine (daily, fortnightly, monthly, or quarterly).
Nice — here are the standard numeric test voltages
you asked for (power-frequency 1-minute and lightning-impulse) that are
normally applied to 66 kV and 132
kV XLPE cable systems. I pulled these from IEC 60840 / allied
technical specs and BIS product material so you can use them directly in test
procedures or technical specifications.
Quick note: in standards/workspecs the cable rated/system voltages
are often expressed as the highest system voltage (Um). In practice 66 kV class
equipment is normally treated as Um = 72.5 kV
and 132 kV as Um = 145 kV; test
voltages in IEC/IS are defined against those class voltages. The tables below
therefore use the commonly adopted Um equivalents.
Recommended test voltages (typical values used in IEC 60840 / practice)
|
Cable class
(nominal) |
Common Um used in
standards |
Power-frequency
withstand (r.m.s.) — 1 min |
Lightning impulse
withstand (1.2/50 µs) — peak |
|
66 kV |
72.5 kV |
~160 kV (rms) — 1 min. (Tianan
Group) |
~350 – 380 kV (peak)
(commonly quoted 350–380 kV for 72.5 kV class). (Tianan
Group, Hitachi
Energy) |
|
132 kV |
145 kV |
~275 kV (rms) — 1 min (often
specified as 275 kV). (Hitachi
Energy, Bharat Heavy Electricals
Limited) |
~650 kV (peak) (typical
lightning impulse level for 145 kV class). (Hitachi
Energy, Bharat Heavy Electricals
Limited) |
Additional clarifications & practical points
·
Duration &
waveforms: the power-frequency test is normally applied for 1
minute (r.m.s. sinusoidal). The lightning test is standard 1.2/50
µs impulse (peak) as per IEC conventions.
·
Where these appear in
standards: IEC-60840 contains the normative
relationships/tables that give test voltages related to rated voltages (see
clause on “relationship of test voltages to rated voltages” and Table(s) of
test voltages). IS-7098 (Pt-3) follows the same framework for 66–220 kV XLPE
cables (BIS Product Manual references). (BIS)
·
Range / rounding:
some documents quote slightly different numbers depending on whether they use
the nominal rated voltage (66/132 kV) or the standard Um value (72.5/145 kV) —
and whether they round to manufacturer/utility practice. That’s why you see
small spreads (e.g., 350 vs 380 kV). For procurement/test sheets use the exact
numeric values called out by the purchaser/utility (or the specific
clause/table in IEC 60840 / IS 7098 that applies). (BIS)
·
Accessories / joints /
terminations: the impulse + power-frequency sequence and
specific values for joints/terminations are covered in IEC-60840 Annexes/tables
(H, G). Those accessory values can differ from cable-only values — check the
relevant table when testing accessories.
Thursday, April 17, 2014
is Copper as earth pit is better then GI earth pit?
- d=Diameter
of Pipe/Rod in cm
- r =
Resistivity of Soil Ohm-meter.
The material resistivity is not considered anywhere in the above formulas.
So will never be losing end even when you are spending more money on Copper earthing instead of GI earthing.
Difference between grounding and earthing
Difference
Between Grounding and Earthing: Myths vs Standards
Electrical safety often raises confusion between
the terms grounding and earthing. Many people assume that grounding
refers only to the connection of current-carrying conductors (like transformer
or generator neutral) to earth, whereas earthing refers to the
connection of non-current carrying metallic parts (like enclosures, motor
frames, or panels).
👉 This distinction is actually a myth.
According to recognized standards, both
grounding and earthing mean the same thing. The confusion mainly arises
from differences in terminology across countries.
Grounding vs Earthing: Origin of the Terminology
- British English (UK, IEC,
IS):
Uses the word Earthing.
- American English (USA, IEEE,
ANSI):
Uses the word Grounding.
So, it’s
more a matter of language preference than technical difference.
Standards and Definitions
IS 3043:1987 (Code of Practice for Earthing)
The terms
“earthing” and “grounding” are synonymous.
IEC 60050 (International Electrotechnical
Vocabulary)
“The terms earth and ground have both
been generally used to explain the common electrical/signal reference
interchangeably all over the world.”
- USA & North America →
Prefer Ground
- UK & Europe, Asia →
Prefer Earth
IEEE Definition of Grounding
Ground (Ground System): A conducting connection, whether
intentional or accidental, through which an electrical circuit or equipment is
connected to the earth or some conducting body of relatively large extent that
serves instead of the earth.
Equivalent IEC/IS Definition of Earthing
Earth (Earth System): A conducting connection, whether
intentional or accidental, through which an electrical circuit or equipment is
connected to the mass of earth or some conducting body of relatively large
extent that serves instead of the mass of earth.
👉 Notice how the definitions are identical — only
the terminology differs.
Myth vs Reality
|
Myth |
Reality |
|
Grounding
= current-carrying parts (neutral) |
Grounding
and Earthing are same concept, only different terminology |
|
Earthing
= non-current carrying metallic parts |
Both
terms mean connecting electrical parts to earth |
|
They
are two separate safety systems |
They
are synonymous in IEC, IS, IEEE & ANSI standards |
Practical Takeaway
- Whether you say “Earthing”
or “Grounding”, the purpose is the same:
✅ To provide a safe path for fault currents
✅ To stabilize voltage during unbalanced conditions
✅ To protect human life and equipment from shock hazards - Use the terminology
according to the standards you are following:
- India / IEC → Earthing
- USA / IEEE → Grounding
Conclusion
There is no
technical difference between grounding and earthing. The confusion only
exists because of British vs American English terminology. Engineers
should focus on the function (safety and fault current dissipation) rather than
the naming convention.
Wednesday, April 16, 2014
Fault current direction
Misconceptions About Fault Current Direction in Electrical Systems
In electrical engineering, there are widespread misconceptions regarding the direction of fault current. Many assume fault current simply flows from the source to the load, as in normal operation. However, this interpretation is misleading and can cause incorrect system protection design.
Fault Current Flow – The Correct Understanding
-
Under normal conditions, current flows from source → load.
-
During a fault at the load end, the effective resistance/impedance at the fault point reduces drastically (almost to zero).
-
As a result, the fault current appears to “flow backwards”: the load-end protection sees the fault first and should trip before the transformer or upstream breaker.
-
In reality, although current is still drawn from the source, the magnitude and point of detection of fault current is determined by the fault location.
👉 That is why modern electrical systems are designed to ensure protection coordination, so the load-end breaker trips first and prevents unnecessary tripping of upstream devices.
Protection System Design Principle
The guiding principle:
The protective device nearest to the fault must operate first.
This ensures selectivity and continuity of supply for the rest of the system.
Example rule:
-
If the load current = 300 A, the MCCB/SFU at load end should be rated slightly higher (e.g., 400 A frame size) but with protection settings at ≤300 A for overload and appropriately for short-circuit and earth fault.
-
This ensures the load trips before the transformer or feeder breaker.
Practical Example: 160 kW Motor
-
Motor rating: 160 kW
-
Rated current: ≈ 297 A
-
Load-end MCCB/SFU selection: 315 A
-
Overload relay setting: ≤ 297 A (rated motor current)
-
Earth fault relay setting: ~10% of full load current
-
Main upstream breaker (source side): 400 A MCCB/SFU for the entire motor system
This setup ensures that:
-
The motor’s local protection clears any overload, short-circuit, or earth fault.
-
The upstream breaker remains intact unless the local breaker fails or the fault propagates.
-
Transformer protection remains the last line of defense, avoiding unnecessary trips.
Key Takeaways
-
Fault current is not simply “source to load”; it is governed by the fault location and system impedance.
-
Local protection must be set to isolate faults immediately.
-
Proper coordination between MCCBs, SFUs, and relays ensures system reliability and safety.
⚠️ Disclaimer: This article is intended for educational and engineering awareness purposes only. Actual protection coordination and fault current analysis must be carried out as per IEC/IS standards, manufacturer guidelines, and detailed short-circuit studies for each electrical installation. Always consult a qualified protection engineer before finalizing settings.
Electrical Wiring Estimate for a 100 Gaj House
For a 100 gaj house (approximately 900 sq. ft. or 83.6 m²),generally concealed copper wiring system using FRLS (Flame Retardant Low Smoke) ...
-
Tan Delta Test (Loss Angle Test / Dissipation Factor Test) The Tan Delta Test is also known as the loss angle test or dissipation fact...
-
⚡ The Ultimate Guide to Number of Discs Required for Very High Voltages and Selection Methods Introduction In modern power transmissi...
-
🏗 ️ Technical Specification of Aluminium Cables (IS 7098: Part 1 – 1988) When specifying aluminium cables, you will often come acros...





